2 LETTERS ABOUT CHANGE.ORG / BILL GATES. 3 LARGE 5G PETITIONS DETELED
LETTER TO CHANGE.ORG'S CEO ABOUT UNJUST DELETION OF BELGIAN ANTI-5G PETITION
Reza Ganjavi, MBA, BSc Computer Science, BA Philosophy, Magna Cum Laude, Dean’s Honors, Phi Kappa Phi, Alpha Gamma Sigma
www.rezamusic.com · www.emfcrisis.com
Mr. Ben Rattray, CEO, Change.org
548 Market Street Private Mailbox #29993
San Francisco, CA 94104-5401 USA
Phone: (415) 236-3829
Fax: (415) 520-2154
Carrer de Santaló, 10 1st Floor
08021 Barcelona Spain
Dear Mr. Rattray
Activists trusted your platform. You deleted two large petitions recently. We reviewed your terms of service and community guidelines (see below), and evaluated the text of the petition against it and found no violation. We are working hard to help the world, people, animals, nature, against being constantly microwaved at levels 300+ times the safe limit. If you’re not aware of the topic, please educate yourself, for your own health’s sake. You can visit www.emfcrisis.com – see the scientist video collection for example.
Please evaluate this case, and reinstate the petitions. You cannot betray people’s trust like this, and contradict your own statements about “empowering people” etc. – people trusted you – huge effort was put into a petition – which you recklessly deleted. Please reinstate. Thank you.
One of the petitions is by a young Swiss activist. It had about 70,000 signatures. URL was: https://www.change.org/p/urs-schaeppi-p%C3%A9tition-contre-la-5g-et-ces-dangers
It was deleted on 10 April 2020 – same time as the petition below from Belgium was ruthlessly deleted by you.
PS -- Bill Gates being a major investor in your company should not affect your ethical decisions otherwise money is buying your ethics.
DELETED PETITION TEXT (BELGIUM)
marie laure BERAUD a lancé cette pétition adressée à Gouvernement belge
Alors que nous sommes dans un moment de grande impuissance due au confinement, Proximus en tête décide d'installer la 5G. Or nous connaissons le désastre que cela entraînerait aussi bien pour la faune que pour nous humains.
Est-ce normal d'infliger sans accord préalable de la population un tel fléau?
Nos responsables politiques sont-ils vraiment responsables? On en doute.
Nous ne voulons pas de votre 5G!!!!!
Comment est-ce possible à l'heure où nous avons la preuve des nuisances qu'elle engendrerait, comment est-ce possible alors que la planète est malade de trop de tout ?
Mais nos politiques n'en ont cure car seul le profit compte.
Nous continuons à courir à notre perte et vous les politiques en êtes les responsables. Dans quelle logique mortifère êtes vous donc?
Alors que nous devrions préserver cette nature que nous avons mis à genoux , qu'au lieu de continuer à la détruire nous devrions la chérir et la préserver pour les générations futures, vous nous imposez sa destruction.
A l'heure où nous voyons à quel point nous sommes faibles au regard de cette pandémie il est inadmissible de profiter de ce temps de confinement pour nous imposer cette folie.
NON NON et NON nous ne voulons pas de votre 5G
Marie Laure BERAUD launched this petition addressed to the Belgian Government
While we are in a moment of great powerlessness due to the confinement, Proximus in the lead decides to install the 5G. We are aware of the disaster that this would entail for both wildlife and us humans.
Is it normal to inflict such a scourge without the prior agreement of the population?
Are our politicians really responsible? We doubt it.
We don't want your 5G!!!!!!
How is it possible at a time when we have proof of the nuisance it would cause, how is it possible when the planet is sick with too much of everything?
But our policies don't care because only profit counts.
We continue to run to our doom and you politicians are the ones responsible. What kind of moralistic logic are you in?
When we should be preserving this nature that we have brought to our knees, when instead of continuing to destroy it we should be cherishing it and preserving it for future generations, you are imposing its destruction on us.
At a time when we see how weak we are in the face of this pandemic, it is inadmissible to take advantage of this time of confinement to impose this madness on us.
NO NO and NO we do not want your 5G.
EXCERPT FROM TERMS OF SERVICE
Change.org’s mission is to empower people everywhere to create the change they want to see. We’re an open platform because we believe more change happens when people with different backgrounds and perspectives can participate in the conversation. We do need rules to keep our platforms safe for you, us, and the community. These Terms of Service outline rights and responsibilities related to our platform and services.
These Terms of Service cover your activities on Change.org, our platform that enables people to create the change they want to see. Our platform allows people to start and promote “campaigns”, which include petitions and related actions like creating and sharing content via our platforms and third-party sites and services.
1. User content rules
You’re responsible for what you post on our platforms. You should keep your campaigns and other content you upload in line with all Community Guidelines and the law, and respect the intellectual property rights of others. It’s not something we want to do, but we can terminate your account for repeated or major offenses.
Follow our Community Guidelines: When posting content you must follow the Community Guidelines that are applicable to the product or feature you are using.
Abide by the law and respect rights of others: You cannot post any campaign or content that violates applicable local or national laws of your country, or internationallaws or regulations. If your fundraising initiative is not legitimate, don’t start it. You are solely responsible for any campaign, content, and actions you post or take via the platforms and their consequences.
EXCERPT FROM COMMUNITY GUIDELINES
As an open platform, anyone can use Change.org no matter who they are, where they live, and what they believe. This is why you’ll see an extremely wide range of petitions, as they’ve all been created by people in the community.
Our role is to make sure the platform is a powerful vehicle for change while remaining as safe as possible for our users. That’s why we’ve put together these Community Guidelines which, along with our Terms of Service, outline the rules for using Change.org.
Now, here are the things we don’t like to see on Change.org, which may force us to remove content or restrict user accounts. Just so you know, “content” refers to the text and images in petitions, usernames, comments, and anything else you contribute to the platform.
· No hate speech – We’re fans of free speech, but we don’t allow hate speech. Hate speech is typically the advocacy of beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people based on characteristics such as their age, colour, disability, ethnic origin, gender identity, nationality, national origin, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, medical condition, or veteran status.
· No violence – Ideas are powerful and can be forceful and peaceful catalysts for change. We don’t allow content that directly incites, glorifies, or encourages violence against anyone.
· Don’t impersonate others – Change.org is designed to share the stories of real people, supporting real issues. You need to use your email address to start or sign a petition and we don’t allow multiple accounts. Don’t sign petitions for other people, use anyone else’s email address, or impersonate people, including public figures or organizations.
· Don’t violate others’ privacy – Most content on Change.org is public, so respect the privacy of anyone else you mention. Don’t post private information, like private email addresses, identification documents, credit card numbers, home addresses, private telephone numbers, or photographs of people in private settings posted without their consent.
· Don’t bully – You can be influential and respectful at the same time. When working to persuade decision makers and other users, focus on people’s actions rather than their personal characteristics. While we expect debate and disagreement, we don’t tolerate abuse, stalking, threats, trolling, or any form of bullying.
· Don’t be unnecessarily graphic – Emotionally powerful content can make or break a campaign. Graphic content can be used to condemn behaviour or show the seriousness of an issue, however give other users a warning about such content, where possible. Don’t post gratuitously violent, sexually explicit, or needlessly upsetting images and words.
· Don’t cause harm to children – Only parents and legal guardians have the right to post content about their children online, including images. Don’t use Change.org to post content that violates laws on child protection, child pornography, or sexual exploitation. We want to protect children, which is one of the reasons why you have to be 13 years or older to use Change.org.
· Don’t spam – Change.org is for issues of public interest. It’s OK to have a commercial interest in your petition’s success, but you shouldn’t use the platform to directly sell products, send bulk, unsolicited communications, or for any other spam-like behaviour.
· Don’t break the law – You can use Change.org to raise awareness about laws you want to change, but this isn’t a platform for illegal activity. Make sure that your use of Change.org doesn’t violate applicable national law, including laws protecting the rights of other people. For example, make sure you have evidence for claims you make, as we may have to remove content that is established to be defamatory.
April 16, 2020
TO: Mr. Ben Rattray, CEO, Change.org
Dear Mr. Rattray
Activists trusted your platform. You deleted their petition. We reviewed your terms of service and community guidelines (see below), and evaluated the text of the petition against it and found no violation. We are working hard to help the world, people, animals, nature, against being constantly microwaved at levels 300x and more than safe limit. If you’re not aware of the topic, please educate yourself, for your own health’s sake. You can visit www.emfcrisis.com – see the scientist video collection for example.
Please evaluate this case, and reinstate the petition. You cannot betray people’s trust like this, and contradict your own statements about “empowering people” etc. – people trusted you – huge effort was put into a petition – which you recklessly deleted. Please reinstate. Thank you.
Change.org also deleged Isle of Wight No to 5G Petition and provided no reasonable explanation to Tanja Rebel who corresponded with them on the topic. Shame on Change.org. Shame on Bill Gates!
CALL TO URSULA VON DER LEYEN TO FIRE ANTHONY WHELAN AND ADOPT AN INTELLIGENT, HOLISTIC POLICY TO MANAGE 5G/EMF-POLLUTION
Via Email and Registered Post
19 Nov 2020
To: Honorable Ms. Ursula von der Leyen, President, European Commission firstname.lastname@example.org
To: Anthony Whelan, Digital policy adviser to President Ursula von der Leyen, Anthony.WHELAN@ec.europa.eu, +32 229-50941
Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200
Subject: Call to EU President to fire Anthony Whelan,and adopt an intelligent policy towards managing 5G/RF-EMF-pollution
Dear Ms. von der Leyen
You should fire Mr. Anthony Whelan, because he's giving you and member states of European Commission wrong advice regarding 5G technology. He just spoke at an industry conference and it became very evidence what he's about.
Mr. Whelan is singing the wicked industry's song, and dancing to the tune of the morally (and perhaps financially) corrupt wireless industry which is pushing for more and more deployment of their microwave generating cell antennas.
Mr. Whelan should be fired because he's totally ignoring credible science that in his position he should be very well aware of -- which unequivocally states that microwave pollution causes DNA damage and a host of other biologically damaging effects which the current safety standards completely ignore.
Your commission has also ignored a very clear call from a huge number of experts that have warned you against deployment of 5G (see www.5gappeal.eu -- and www.emfscientist.org). These are scientists who are not prostitutes to the industry and their call is out of grave concern for humanity, for people of EU and the world, for health, well-being, biological integrity, happiness and wholeness of us humans.
On the contrary, the wicked wireless industry and their cronies only care about money. Don't fool yourselves. This is NOT about the economy. Mr. Whelan can pack his bags and leave his post and nothing adverse will happen to the economy.
You cannot sell people's DNA-integrity to the greed of the wireless industry, leave people uninformed, fail to educate them as EU has totally filed in that (about harms, risks, safe use of technology), lie to them about safety, deceive them into believing they need what they absolutely do not need -- nobody needs faster downloads and driverless cars at the expense of their DNA integrity.
Ms. von der Leyen, you need to stand for what's right and shut this stupid, wicked song that's sung by Mr. Whelan and the industry. People of Europe are fed up with lies and your office ignoring real science. It's time to pay attention to real science and not paid-manipulated dogmatic science.
The song Mr. Whelan sings is the same song that the Church sang in Dark Ages. The Earth is no longer flat Ms. von der Leyen.
Stop pushing the member states to expedite their 5G deployment which will make hell out of Europe. It's already hell with 4G. Most people live in radiation levels that are 100's of times the biologically safe limit (see the Bioinitiative Report). And they receive no education from governments (e.g. on use of wired-internet at home which is far safer than WiFi, and that their phone was never meant to be a movie theater -- heavy download or streaming not only overloads the networks but it generates a huge amount of harmful radiation.
The safe way to go about this -- and not lose much -- is to keep cell towers out of residential areas and inner cities. Teach people how to use the technology safety so they don't overload the networks. 4G can serve people from a far distance and NOT be biologically harmful for those who are not connected to it. And those who connect must learn the right, socially responsible, healthy way of using the technology.
That's the holistic way of going about this problem. The current industry's way is utterly stupid and ruins the world with more and more antennas, and stronger antennas, more DNA damage which is very very dangerous for the future of humanity.
Please use your common sense and think for yourself instead of being manipulated by the industry and their spokespeople on your team.
You should also lobby Germany to STOP funding ICNIRP which is a cesspool of industry-bias. ICNIRP should be dissolved and completely redefined -- and not by industry.
Réza Ganjavi, MBA, BSCS, BA Phil. Magna Cum Laude, Phi Kappa Phi, Alpha Gamma Sigma
FEEDBACK TO THE EUROPEAN UNION WHICH LIES TO PEOPLE ABOUT 5G
REZA GANJAVI'S FEEDBACK TO THE EUROPEAN UNION SOCIAL MEDIA TEAM WHO FEED PEOPLE WITH LIES ABOUT 5G
European Commission, ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR MIND? Your logic is flawed. Your lines are shaped by an evil industry supported by a lazy United Nations which ignored the 2015 scientist appeal, and your own ignorance of the scientist appeal to the EU. There's a huge scientific body that shows RF-EMF is harmful to health. The burden of proof is on the industry (and you) to show this technology is safe. Do you even comprehend this line of thought? Probably not -- you're probably a puppet -- a robot -- a machine -- sitting there, typing the "party line" to fool and deceive people. Shame on you.
But tell us this: what is the EU Commission's reaction to the Scientist call for a moratorium? Let me guess: ZILCH, because you're all in the pocket of the industry and love the decades old standards that totally ignore biological damage.
European Commission, What a joke! You don't need 5G for a digital economy. Fiberglass works much better and is much safer and has zero toxic emissions. Plus, nobody needs faster downloads or to have IoT which has even data on how much toilette paper you use. And 5G is extremely unhealthy. STOP DECEIVING PEOPLE WITH FALSEHOODS.
European Commission, YOUR MAXIMUM EXPOSURE LIMITS ARE USELESS BECAUSE THEY'RE BASED ON STUDIES THAT MEASURE THERMAL EFFECT (PHYSICS) AND TOTALLY IGNORE BIOLOGICAL DAMAGE. THE INDUSTRY ITSELF KNOWS THIS RADIATION IS BIOLOGICALLY DAMAGING. SEE THIS:
SHAME ON YOU. DID YOU READ THE SCIENTIST MORATORIUM? YES YOU DID. BUT YOU DECIDED TO IGNORE IT FOR THE INTEREST OF BIG MONEY (YOUR MASTERS). WHAT ABOUT THE HEALTH IMPACTS ARE NOT CLEAR TO YOU? WWW.EMFCRISIS.COM
European Commission, Are you kidding me? Industrial transformation doesn't need WIRELESS connectivity. If your idea of transformation is to have cars without drivers, you'd be stupid to get into one of those cancer boxes. You guys think people are stupid? People understand things you ignore in favor of your masters (BIG MONEY). You are just puppets of the industry and their lobbying. Those cars are so zapped with HF-EMF that you'd be stupid to get in one.
And if you think of "industrial transformation" as FASTER DOWNLOADS, nobody needs that. That's just a FAKE NEED promoted by the industry.
And if you think of "industrial transformation" as IoT, NO THANKS. People can decide for themselves when their toilette paper runs low -- they don't need a wireless dispenser. And we like our data privacy, and we don't want our data to be a commodity which is the real drive behind IoT.
STOP DECEIVING PEOPLE WITH LIES AND LINES OF THE INDUSTRY WHICH ARE ONLY FOCUSED ON PROFITS. YOU HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO PEOPLE TO CARE FOR THEIR HEALTH. DID YOU READ THE SCIENTIST MORATORIUM?
Are you kidding? 4G is already extremely unsafe and based on standards that totally ignore biological damage. The idea that 5G is low powered and goes a short distance is a lie. Studies show it travels a long way. But it's irrelevant, weak or strong, long or short, fact is they zap the entire area with HF-EMF which has been PROVEN to cause serious biological damage. This was pointed out to the UN in 2015 www.emfscientist.org but it was ignored just as you suckers IGNORED the scientist appeal. "We're all aware of it" just means we know it's there but we decided to IGNORE it in favor of industry. SHAME ON THE EUROPEAN UNION which is just as Useless as Useless Nations (UN) and is just a tool for BIG MONEY with ZERO CONCERN FOR PEOPLE'S HEALTH AND WELLBEING.
European Commission, That is purely a bunch of LIES supported by ZERO scientific research. STOP LYING TO PEOPLE E.U. -- YOU WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSEQUENCES FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY IF WHAT YOU SAY TURNS OUT TO BE UNSUBSTANTIATED.
CAN YOU CITE ONE STUDY -- NOT 10 BUT JUST ONE -- THAT SHOWS EXPOSURE TO HF-EMF IS BIOLOGICALLY SAFE? AND THAT EXPOSURE TO 5G IS BIOLOGICALLY SAFE? YOU CANNOT -- THEREFORE YOU TELL PEOPLE WHAT YOUR MASTERS TELL YOU WHICH IS A BUNCH OF LIES, TO DECEIVE PEOPLE, TRICK THEM, FOOL THEM, WITH BLACK MAGIC. This is not industrial transformation. This is DARK AGES REINCARNATION.
European Commission: "We have in place strict and safe limits for electromagnetic fields"
Reza Ganjavi: STOP LYING TO PEOPLE -- YOUR IDEA OF "SAFE" MEANS IT WAS DETERMINED THAT IT WON'T BURN YOU -- THAT'S ALL! -- AND THOSE LIMITS WERE SET WITHOUT *ANY* STUDIES ON BIOLOGICAL DAMAGE. STOP LYING TO PEOPLE.
European Commission: "There is no scientific evidence that restricting these limits even further would bring any additional health safety benefits."
Reza Ganjavi: HOW MANY GRADE EDUCATION DO YOU HAVE? when a new drug is being proposed for marketing does the EU Medicinal Agency say, you don't need to show safety studies? You don't need evidence that tightening limits would provide benefits. You need evidence that exposure is safe. What about this is so hard to comprehend. I'm sure y'all are not stupid -- but these stupid lines and lies that are scripted to you to feed to people are done by people with vicious intent who have chosen to ignore facts, logic, decency, and our health. SHAME ON YOU EU AND YOU THE PERSON WHO'S writing the replies like a robot -- you should quit your job or get a respectable job than being a tool for such evil acts. Get a respectable job than sitting there all day lying to people. And if you have doubts see www.emfcrisis.com -- those scientists know a lot more than your Big Money masters.
DON'T BELIEVE THE LIES THAT E.U. IS TELLING YOU. IT'S CAPTURED BY INDUSTRY SPECIAL INTEREST. 5G is absolutely unnecessary and absolutely unsafe. www.emfcrisis.com
Alberto, this is not Toy Land!! Cars were never meant to be communicating with other things at the price of the passengers being fast tracked to cancer. I don't think you get the point! This tech is DIRTY -- UNTESTED -- UNSAFE -- look at www.emfcrisis.com scientist videos.
Most of the other things you said can perfectly be handled without 5G. 5G is unnecessary and unhealthy.
Mick Norweeld: "optical fiber has a much higher bandwidth and no delays, even an ordinary LAN cable cat 5e has a greater bandwidth than 5G cell network and it is absolutely safe"
Reza Ganjavi: Mick you can easily put a LAN cable on a phone -- but shoosh don't tell the EU -- their head is in the pocket of Big Money.
Anne Harper: "A precautionary approach that insurers won’t touch? If they don’t believe that it’s safe, why should we?"
LETTER TO MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND ABOUT 5G
TO MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
WE THE PEOPLE WON A 5G BATTLE AS THEY WITHDREW VOTE ON 5G SMALL CELLS!
BY REZA GANJAVI
Mr. Hans Riemer:
What planet are you coming from ? Listen to you, after your cause FAILED today (bad news for you and the industry you support -- good news for goodness, health, well-being of people):
"In my view, our County needs to embrace wireless infrastructure, just as we embrace water, power, and transportation infrastructure.
Building infrastructure is always difficult and some residents object to having small cell antennas in their neighborhoods. A zoning measure based on a goal of keeping wireless away from our residents is not realistic or desirable. I do not, and will not, support that approach. The Council has developed a good foundation for the next Council to build on. I look forward to taking this issue up again with the new Council."
Hans, have you even bothered to look at anything beyond what the industry has fed you? Have you seen any research? If so you would not be so stupid as to compare wireless radiation with water, power, and transportation. Since when was water carcinogenic? Since when do buses cause thinning of blood-brain-barrier? Since when does your home electricity weaken your immune system? GET REAL DUDE!
Your ideas and the industry you so ignorantly (or intentionally) support will NEVER fly because people are not stupid. They will fight teeth and nails against their lives being ruined by stupid ideas like yours and a crooked industry which lies to people, ignores solid data, and has its head stuck in the sand of 35-year old outdated obsolete "standards".
Keeping wireless equipment away from people is DESIRED, not undesired as you ignorantly assess. Distance is key. Ever heard of inverse-square law? Who the hell needs driver-less cars? Who do you know who's willing to risk their health to get a frikin 20 second faster download? Get frikin real man! This entire effort is a crooked propagation and imposition of a dirty, unsafe, highly risky, toxic technology on people WHO DON'T WANT IT, by a selfish, money-worshiping industry who's business model is to create this need artificially. Ya, you really need a sms when your milk goes low because you're too lazy to move your fat ass to check in the fridge. That's the Internet of Things that the industry you support is pushing for. I'm a technocrat but your ideas are FALSE BAD LOUSY, MR. RIEMER. It's never too late to repent.
What about this is not clear to you? PEOPLE DO NOT WANT IT. They don't want to risk their health to get a technology that has ZERO BENEFIT to them.
On 10/30/18 2:41 AM, R.GANJAVI wrote:
By the way, 5G is nothing but an fabrication of the industry for the sake of money. NOBODY needs faster downloads these days. Our speeds are plenty fast. 99.99% of people are willing to wait an extra 15 seconds for the darn movie to download if the cost of additional speed is cancer.
Even WHO has categorized this radiation as possibly carcinogen and the key scientist involved now says it should be classified as carcinogen.
Have you not seen this? www.emfscientist.org ????
Do you really think we need driver-less cars??? At what cost? I'm technocrat but 5G is crooked bad evil business. The is no doubts among the science community that this technology is dirty. Watch my talk on this topic. It's the first in this series of videos on this brand-new, under-construction site: www.emfcrisis.com -- see the other talks too -- they're priceless, but watch out: it may wake up and rattle those of you who are irresponsibly ignoring your constituents' health, well-being, peace, or are too afraid, are too chicken to think for yourselves and not blindly quote the Feds as Gods. Think. It's your life, stand up for your rights to challenge what's handed to you. You have that responsibility to your kids, the future generations, and to your constituents.
On 10/29/18 11:52 PM, R.GANJAVI wrote:
To: Mr. Riemer and the rest of the council members who are leaning towards the Wireless crooks:
You have a responsibility to your constituents. You're in that office to bat for the people and not for the industry. You need to think for yourself. I'm sure you can. I don't know what your agenda is. Fed is not God. Who is Fed? FCC who's a captured agency? Did you notice they deferred health issues to FDA. Did you know FDA hasn't done any health assessment? Did you know the standards you're trying to push onto people are 35 years old and inapplicable and based on physics and they ignore biological damage which have been shown via thousands of studies in the last 10 years?
You KNOW all this, I am sure, yet you choose to ignore it.
Do you let your kid sleep next to a WiFi router? If you do, you're stupid. If you don't, you shouldn't want your kid, or anyone you love, and the constituents whom you are paid to care for to do that either. 5G radiation includes 4G, 3G and is the same characteristic as WiFi and your cell phone. What about this you don't get? Think of karma, consequence, and how your kids will look at your in years to come when they see this vote.
Please do the right thing and vote NO to ZTA 18-11. If you don't think the science is established that 5G is harmful, you haven't done your homework, and have bought Wireless industry's lies and deceptive practices.
Reza Ganjavi (MBA, BSCS, BA Phil, magna cum laude, phi kappa phi)
LETTER TO NEW YORK TIMES ABOUT SHAMEFUL 5G COLLABORATION WITH VERIZON
Letter to New York Times about 5G Collaboration with Verizon
BY REZA GANJAVI
15 MAY 2019
To: New York Times
If you have any integrity, publish this!
Your 5G article of 12 May 2019 is hilarious. It reeks of moral corruption, i.e., knowingly lying to people about the most important thing in their life: HEALTH.
Verizon and New York Times' joint venture to build a "journalism lab" is a comic testimony to that corruption. Sounds like a boiler room where New York Times would help Verizon -- which is on record for lying to people about safety -- to brainwash people into believing their toxic technology is safe.
Fact is 5G is unnecessary, untested, unhealthy. 4G is just as bad but 5G is even worse because the frequency can be boosted much higher. 4G has already ruined our cities. WiFi has ruined homes, banks, restaurants, cinemas, police offices, etc etc etc -- it's everywhere just as smoking was in the 1940's. WiFi, 4G, 5G, microwaves, Smart Meters, cell phones (when connected via wireless), Bluetooth all emit HF-EMF which has been shown through thousands of studies to cause biological damage.
Current standards are decades old and are based on physics. Hundreds of peer reviewed, published in HF-EMF, are crying about this. Useless Nations (UN) has ignored their call to tighten the standards (www.emfscientist.org) for years, and EU and other captured governments have ignored the call of hundreds of scientists and doctors about 5G (www.5gappeal.eu).
Verizon CEO has the nerve to go on camera and lie through his teeth about safety. He should be put in jail for that. Same with other companies, including Swisscom (Switzerland's biggest wireless provider majority-owned by the government) which is on record for lying to people about safety. These companies and others like them know perfectly well that RF-EMF causes DNA damage, cancer, and a whole host of other health issues. But they are intentionally ignoring it. Not only they're not living up to their social responsibility of honestly informing people about the risks, they're lying to people..
And New York Times has gone to bed with this corrupt ordeal. Congratulations!
MBA, BSCS, BA Phil, magna cum laude, Phi Kappa Phi
LETTER TO/ABOUT MR. JOSEPH EDELMAN
Letter to/about Mr. Joseph Edelman
by Reza Ganjavi
For those of you not familiar with Mr. Joseph Edelman, here are some excerpts from his biography:
He's a grandson of a Jewish emigrant who came to the USA with no money. His grandmother died from brain cancer. His father was a renowned scientist. He spent time in Israel and said the talent there was extraordinary. Years later, Mr. Edelman, as a biotech analyst, and self-made billionaire hedge fund manager, took a sizable position in Foamix, a biotech company with a topnotch science developed by Israeli scientists. It was later merged/acquired by an American company, VYNE Therapeutics, and is now trading on Nasdaq as VYNE. Mr. Adelman's Perceptive Advisors still owns a significant stake in VYNE. Last quarter he upped his stake in VYNE by $5,000,000.
Perceptive's focus is small- and mid-cap biotechs, and it's done really well.
Mr. Edelman takes a particular interest in mental health, and has done a lot of good work in that area.
@Mr. Edelman, if you're reading this, first, thanks for your support of VYNE. Second, please check out the field of microwave pollution. Several credible studies link it to mental health and cognitive issues, aside from numerous medical conditions.
The wireless industry with backing from FCC and FDA, has become one of the biggest cases of evil in human history. Their entire agenda is based on lies and misinformation. FDA has posted an outright lie on their website, which has become a point of reference worldwide (1). FCC is in bed with the industry (2). Scientists worldwide are crying about the topic but a corrupt UN/WHO/IARC/ICNIRP has turned a deaf ear (3).
Not a single study show long term exposure to RF-EMF to be safe. Thousands show harm. Please support entities like Environmental Health Trust (4), and The Environment and Cancer Research Foundation (5), Americans for Responsible Technology (6).
Here's my site about the topic: www.emfcrisis.com
(3) www.emfscientist.org , https://www.5gappeal.eu/
LETTER TO CHAIRMAN OF BALTIMORE PLANNING COMMISSION, SEAN DAVIS
TO: SEAN DAVIS,
CHAIRMAN, BALTIMORE PLANNING COMMISSION SDAVIS@MRAGTA.COM
1414 KEY HIGHWAY,
SUITE 201P BALTIMORE, MD 21230 PHONE: 410-935-5050
AS A HUMAN I AM
ASHAMED OF US FROM HAVING A PERSON LIKE YOU SIT THERE, INTERRUPT RESIDENTS OF
BALTIMORE WHEN THEY RAISE CONCERNS ABOUT THEIR HEALTH.
HOW WOULD YOU
FEEL IF YOU HAD HEALTH ISSUES? IF YOU HAD CANCER, OR WERE ABOUT TO GET CANCER?
WOULD YOU THINK OF YOURSELF PREEMPTED TO RAISE CONCERNS ABOUT IT?
INTERRUPTING PEOPLE LIKE A ROBOT, REPEATING THE LINES THAT ARE DICTATED TO YOU
BY THE FCC AND THE CROOKED INDUSTRY THAT’S PROTECTED BY THAT CAPTURED AGENCY.
YOU HAVE A BRAIN
– YOU HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO USE IT. YOU ALSO HAVE A HEART – WHETHER IT’S
MADE OF IRON OR MONEY, I DON’T KNOW – BUT YOU DON’T SEEM TO BE USING YOUR BRAIN
OR YOUR HEARD. LET ME HELP YOU:
YOU CAN CHALLENGE
THE FEDS. YOU DON’T HAVE TO BE THEIR SLAVE, SUBSERVIENT, PUPPET. YOU CAN
CHALLENGE THEM, AND THE PEOPLE WILL STAND BEHIND YOU AND FIGHT FOR THEIR RIGHTS
HAVE YOU USED
YOUR BRAIN TO READ THE STUDIES ? THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF THEM THAT SHOW SERIOUS
HEALTH DAMAGE FROM EXPOSURE TO RF-EMF.
(VERIZON, FCC, ETC.) ARE ON RECORD FOR LYING TO PEOPLE. THE “STANDARDS” THEY
USE ARE DECADES OLD AND ARE BASED ONLY ON PHYSICS (THERMAL EFFECT) AND
COMPLETELY IGNORE BIOLOGICAL DAMAGE. WAKE UP AND STOP BATTING FOR THOSE CROOKED
MASTERS WHO DICTATE THE LINES YOU KEEP USING “WE ARE PREEMPTED”. CHALLENGE IT.
THERE ARE OTHER CITIES THAT ARE CHALLENGING IT.
FIGHT FOR HEALTH,
GOODNESS, WELLBEING OF PEOPLE, AND NOT THE CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TO IMPOSE AN
UNTESTED, UNSAFE, UNNECESSARY, TOXIC TECHNOLOGY ONTO PEOPLE AGAINST THEIR WILL,
JUST BECAUSE THE CROOKED INDUSTRY LIKES TO MAKE WEAK PEOPLE LIKE YOU TO BELIEVE
YOU NEED FASTER DOWNLOADS (WHICH ARE MUCH FASTER AND MORE SECURELY ACHIEVED BY
FIBER OPTIC CABLE CONNECTIONS) – OR YOU’RE STUPID ENOUGH TO WANT TO GO INTO AN
EXTREMELY ZAPPED DRIVERLESS CAR IN A FAST TRACK TO CANCER.
YOU CAN’T PASS
THE BUCK TO LEGISLATURES. YOU HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO STAND UP AND SAY NO. OR
RESIGN. IF ENOUGH OF PEOPLE LIKE RESIGN AND NOT BAT FOR THESE EVIL POWERS, THIS
EVIL CONSPIRACY WILL SIGNIFICANTLY WEAKEN.
“IF IT GOES INTO
THE HEATH SIDE IN ANY WAY, I’M STOPPING IT”. SHAME ON YOU !! YOU SHOULD BE
CALLING OUT CNN'S LIES - LETTER BY RÉZA GANJAVI
Calling out CNN's Lies
- by Reza Ganjavi
14 June 2020
To: Clare Duffy (email@example.com)
via Fax: Mr. Jeffrey Adam Zucker, CEO, CNN 4048272600
Copy: CNN Senior Management
Your article about 5G (https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/14/tech/5g-health-conspiracy-debunked/index.html) is a HUGE let down of science, of dignity integrity and every positive value that true scientific spirit stands for, and a miserable failure in journalistic integrity.
I demand that you immediately remove, or correct your garbage article which is FULL of falsehoods and cold-blooded lies. Did you even bother researching the topic? Or did your bosses dictate it to you, and told you who to talk to to get the industry lines, in favor of whomever is pulling their strings.
When the wicked wireless industry spends a $100m/year buying members of congress, buying CNN is a piece of cake for it. I don't have the facts, but your pathetic articles makes it hard to believe such a trash can be written without influence by beneficiaries.
I don't have time to waste on educating your ignorant mind. But you can even use Google (you know how?) to get yourself some free education before you spew your stupid ideas and deceive the masses about a critical matter of public health; and thereby, convincing your readers to utilize a very dangerous technology that has not been shown via even ONE long-term study, to be safe.
Your authority is a man who's been in the pocked of the industry, Hello! What happened to balanced journalism?
Read here for more info on Kenneth Foster: https://emfcrisis.yolasite.com/kenfoster.php
Your article completely ignored the fact that even 4G is not safe. Even WiFi, Bluetooth are not safe. Your article conveniently ignores the call of hundreds of scientists who have done research on the topic, and have peer-reviewed publications on it that show RF-EMF (5G, 4G, WiFi, etc.) are BIOLOGICALLY damaging. Did you figure out that the standards are only based on PHYSICS (thermal effect) and therefore totally ignore our biology?!
Did you know thousands of studies show biological impact?
Let me know what you plan on doing with this article because as is, it's a HUGE violation of people's basic rights to fair journalism. and we will consider legal action to force you to retract that garbage, if you don't cooperate. And whomever is pulling your strings will be very embarrassed. Or did you come up with this disastrous article on your own?
Here are a few of many links to enlighten you.
www.emfcrisis.com (particularly see the scientist video section)
Take your head out of the sand Clare. You have a RESPONSIBILITY to the society. Otherwise you'd be a mouthpiece of big industry, a slave of money, to do anything they want for money. If that's not the case, WAKE UP. Tell your editor to delete that piece of junk, fix it, then post it, or delete it altogether.
You can reach me on <>
Reza Ganjavi, MBA
LETTER TO PARENTS OF SCHOOL CHILDREN WHO GOT CANCER DUE TO WIRELESS POLLUTION
LETTER TO PARENT OF ONE OF SEVERAL CHILDREN WHO GOT CANCER AT THE WESTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IN RIPON, CALIFORNIA
BY REZA GANJAVI
Just curious -- if you've considered taking the BIG action in this case which potentially could be the tipping point for the whole world.
The crooks have gotten away with lying for a long time with the chief crook, FCC, being their front men.
I believe you have a good rational fair case to sue
· The school
I can't believe Christopher "Kit" Oase sat there and lied through his teeth -- I'm sure they know the studies. When so many other professors and scientist told you guys it's the radiation that caused the cancer, and given so many studies we have, how could Kit not know!
They cannot forever hide behind each other.
Your lawsuit will expose the whole criminal conspiracy between FCC and industry and its impact.
What happened to y'all is what every parent dreads. Please consider taking this move -- consult with an attorney -- you could even sue yourselves without a lawyer -- it cost you 300 or so bucks to file. Telecom act cannot be used as defense either when some entities engaged in criminal action -- e.g. FCC saying we don't know - go to FDA and the rest of the bullshit. They know exactly what they're doing.
I've uploaded the video on Youtube - feel free to share it.
PS -- we also have evidence that Verizon CEO also lies to public.
CALL TO FOUNDERS OF EXTINCTION REBELLION TO CLARIFY THEIR POSITION ON RF POLLUTION
4 Jan 2020
[IMPORTANT] For Gail Bradbrook , Simon Bramwell Please
Dear XR friends: Kindly forward this mail to Gail and Simon. Will you? Please let me know, and if not, please tell me what is the proper effective channel for getting them this note. Many thanks indeed. Reza Ganjavi
To: Gail Bradbrook , Simon Bramwell (Founders of Extinction Rebellion)
Dear Gail, Simon
There are strong allegations that XR leaders are in bed with the wireless lobby/industry. I do not know if this is true, but based on a documentary I saw there seems to be something to the story.
I am an activist leader on RF pollution which is a huge issue that effects all life on Earth, and the Earth itself. I am also a bigtime environmentalist and care deeply about the Earth and its well-being.
It would be really good if you two or one of you, issues a statement and make your position clear on this topic -- just to clear the air. For example:
1) We, the founders of XR, have no affiliations with nor sympathy or support for the Wireless Industry. We view RF Pollution as a serious threat to health, and believe exposure to RF pollution should be minimized, and governments and industry should be truthful with people about this.
[ fact is there's a massive amount of lying going on by industry and government and we're holding the Swiss government for example, accountable. A massive letter endorsed by over 20 top experts is coming out soon, as a massive exposé of the conflict of interest and misrepresentation of credible science in this industry, and moral corruption within government regulators.
Also see www.emfcrisis.com -- e.g. the scientist videos -- the science is solid -- current standards industry uses/loves completely ignore biological damage, and are only thermal based. ]
Or if this is truly your idea, make it clear. the obscurity is killing it and gives rise to all kinds of speculation of corruption, dishonesty, etc.
2) We, the founders of XR, like the Wireless industry. We've had ties with them, and still do [or don't], based on the [false] belief that wireless industry will provide lower emissions [ this is so untrue ] .
You have a responsibility to all the young people who follow you. You cannot preach about climate crisis while ignoring the massive issue right in front of eyes -- take an Acousticom2 and measure your house (unless you're on wired internet and it's just good for others, like telecom exec think). Measure any city you're in and see if the level of RF pollution is over 20 mV/m (safe limit -- see www.bioinitiative.org)
You'll be surprised to see it at 1000, 3000, 6000 mV/m and above -- which is surely damaging DNA and causing cancer and an array of other biological issues the wicked industry ignores, and lies to people saying it's safe. Here's a PROOF of a big fat lie from industry: https://emfcrisis.yolasite.com/swisscomdeception.php
The verdict is very clear about this topic. We want to be on board with XR and Vice Versa.
The allegation goes as far as saying XR is a distraction to let the wicked Wireless industry which XR leaders are in bed with (I don't know if it's true), cover the whole planet.
Please come out with a clear statement. If you do, kindly keep me posted. I run a 25000 person global Stop5G Facebook group and a large Swiss one, and can help spread the word, and erase any misconceptions.
Some of my friends who are members of XR in Switzerland care deeply about threat of RF Pollution, but there is a dark cloud that overhangs the XR movement at the very top (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=536qN22jxak )
Also, if you like to speak about the topic I could meet you in Stroud, at the Beacon or elsewhere, and maybe make a interview or dialogue video together.
Kind Regards & Happy New Year
Whatsapp (I use with wired internet): +...