The word "jerk" here is used for artistic purpose because it rhymes with Jaguar. The root meaning of "jerk" is "tedious and ineffectual person" [1935, American English carnival slang.]
by Reza Ganjavi
Jaguar Jerk broke Swiss criminal insult law twice, totally unprovoked. Probably another case of Swiss Supremacist sentiment thinking he can insult a “foreigner” and get away with it. Because he was being such a jerk, I reported him to the police.
I decided to drop the case after the police interrogated him and sent the case to the prosecutor’s office, for the following reasons:
1) I believe Jaguar Jerk learned a lesson by getting interrogated by a police detective from the criminal investigation unit. That was my main aim for filing a complaint. If I did nothing, he’d do the same vulgar act to others. He’s probably done it before and got away from it.
2) Therefore, I achieved my goal. Pushing to get him a criminal conviction would take energy on my part because I’m dealing with a “justice” system that I don’t trust, a system that’s shown to be extremely biased against people of foreign origin, a system that’s highly corrupted by Swiss Supremacist sentiments, a system in which honesty and truth seem to be matters of convenience and not core values. With exception of course.
3) The assigned prosecutor was in the next office to another prosecutor who’d cooked up falsehoods in the past to allegedly help a native-Swiss attacker get away by almost killing a Swiss man of foreign origin – moi! And she had lied multiple times on legal documents – big small-minded lies that showed she didn’t even fully understand the facts of the case, the evidence, the statements of the defendant, nor the police report! Now my complaint is assigned to a prosecutor who’s in the same division and works for the same guy who is also on record for stating falsehoods and so on – all to the disadvantage of the foreign-born Swiss citizen whose rights were violated by a native Swiss. An environment that I didn’t want to have anything to do with.
4) Therefore, the wise move, now that I had achieved my goal, was to drop the case.
So I called up the prosecutor. I can speak German but English is easier. I asked if he speaks English. I’m sure he did. He said in German: “The official language here is Swiss German” which is not true because the official language is High German. Anyway, he spoke fluent English and we spoke. We arranged that I drop the case against the guy by sending him an email, which I did. Case closed.
So I wrote an email – for the record – to make sure all the facts are there, and no attempted falsehoods / lies have a chance -- and dropped the case, citing the above fact and reason that I think he’s learned his lesson. I didn’t want to expand that also it’s because I prefer not to have anything to do with you people, because of the unconscious bias. This prosecutor seemed like a decent man. I was happy that at least he’d taken time to read the case and understood it -- in a generally biased “justice” system where facts are often overshadowed by bias and racism. But nevertheless, the risk of made-up false fake stories is high for anyone in this society who is of foreign origin, and his or her right is violated by a native-Swiss -- given deep rooted racism and "Swiss Supremacist" conditioning that's prevalent -- which then ends up sucking your time if you're interested in standing up for your rights, and you'd have to bang heads against small-mindedness and dishonesty.
I included in the original complaint to the police, the following:
NOTE ON BIAS IN SWISS JUSTICE SYSTEM
I'm sure you know that Swiss law was written to protect everyone in Switzerland, including those of foreign origin, in the same and equal manner as native-Swiss. Unfortunately, this is often not the case, due to norm of rampant bias in the justice system (with exception). I do not know you and whether you have unconscious bias against non-native-Swiss people, but just to be clear, I know my rights, and I am very determined to fight for my rights, and will not tolerate bias. I trust you will act fairly. The same goes to the prosecutor who gets the case assigned to.
I feel very strongly about this case, given the evidence is unambiguous, and the behavior of the defendant is absolutely unacceptable in our civil society... His vulgar behavior should not be tolerated by the justice system, otherwise, such behavior is endorsed.
Just like if a prosecutor helps a native-Swiss who almost kills a foreign-born-Swiss to avert prosecution, by the prosecuting fabricating falsehoods as facts, etc., is an endorsement of that crime;
Or if a court doesn’t even allow a prosecutor to be investigated, by the court repeating a falsehood fabricated by the prosecutor as fact, knowing it contradicts with the evidence and is materially false; the court is endorsing dishonest conduct by prosecutors by signaling they can get away with it. Justice based on dishonest conduct, rooted in bias, is moral corruption.
CORRECTION OF RECORD
FOR THE RECORD: This document must be added to the following case files, in both paper and electronic formats please. Thank you.
• STA/OSTA: B-8/2021/1...
• STAPO: 8...
10 Oct 2021
Dear Mr. Bruno Hess (STA), Ms. Kolb (OSTA), Mr. Florian Hess (STAPO) –
Having reviewed the case file recently, I came across some falsehoods said about me which need to be corrected for the record. I obtained OSTA’s agreement that this letter will be inserted in the files.
Kindly update the above referenced file numbers, in both paper and electronic versions, with this document which is hereby submitted as s signed PDF document. Kindly print and include it in the paper file, and include the PDF version in the electronic file. It is important that the record includes these facts which I have recently realized upon review of the files of the closed case.
Also the police file needs to updated since the police stated a falsehood which I believe was an error and not intentional.
1) Defendant states that I stopped the car in the middle of the street. This is false. I stopped the car by the side of the road.
2) Defendant states that I insulted him as I got out of the car. That is absolutely false. He has no evidence to prove his false claim, and it’s simply not my personality to insult people. I debate rationally and have no need to utilize insult. I stopped the car because he was acting erratic,and I wanted to understand what the problem was. I was not angry and even if I were (it takes a lot to get me angry), I would not have insulted him because I do not act unlawfully and insulting people is just not my style. My references clearly demonstrate my personality and manners: https://www.rezamusic.com/testimonials .
Furthermore, his own statement that I asked him what was wrong, contradicts his lie that I insulted him, because a person who is wondering what’s wrong doesn’t need to insult, he just asks; which is exactly what I did. I asked him, what was wrong. His manner of coming to me was aggressively and calling me an asshole as the first words he uttered, fit the evidentiary fact (recording) which I submitted for the file. He insulted me twice.
I wanted to inform him that his conduct was unlawful because he was obviously ignorant of what civil conduct is, and he would do that to someone else. And I’m sure in the course of this legal proceedings against him, he learned that lesson, which was the purpose of my reporting him to the police.
3) The defendant’s story that there was almost an accident is utterly a lie. The speeds were extremely low. The speed limit on that road was 30 km/hour and I was going even slower and his car was stopped, and it was a clear day with full visibility, so there was absolutely no risk of an accident. His story is just a way of trying to rationalize his vulgar behavior which also comes across in some of his past Facebook posting which I’ve included for the file.
4) The police falsely stated in the interrogation with him that I made a sign for him to stop his car. His car was already stopped when I approached him, and I drove to the right of him. And spoke to him through his window, informing him that his behavior was criminally unlawful.The purpose of the interaction was not, to ask why he had insulted me before, it was to inform him that his conduct was not civil, and was unlawful.
Therefore, the files should be updated to include these facts for the record. Many thanks for your kind assistance.
Best Regards
Réza Ganjavi, MBA