Compelled Swiss Landlord Move Router / Erzwungener Umzug des Schweizer Vermieters Router

(EN/DE) GERMAN VERSION FOLLOWS - DEUTSCHE VERSION FOLGT]

MY LEGAL CASE AGAINST NEW LANDLORD WHO RECEIVED THE BUILDING AS GIFT FROM HER RICH FATHER WHO CONSIDERED ME AS HIS BEST TENANT, MODEL TENANT, MAN OF TOP INTEGRITY, ETC. (THERE IS SO MUCH EVIDENCE OF THAT FACT INCLUDING HIS OWN LETTERS AND EMAILS). 

This case has been of interest to many people because many people fight against high frequency electromagnetic radiation exposure, which is the core of this topic. This entire saga started when I asked my landlord to move a newly installed WiFi router. And it led to a legal fight, and after a year of fighting in court with a huge legal costs for the landlord, she moved the router, which her father asked her to do early on, before the legal fight, but she refused. 

This article also includes a letter from a top Swiss EMF expert, from Wettingen originally, Mr. Peter Schlegel. 

This article also is about a publicly elected Swiss judge (Daniel Peyer) who exhibited prejudice and small-mindedness and even engaged in manipulation of a legal document to make it look like I did not prevail - whereas I did prevail in getting the landlord to move the WiFi router, which was the core of this case -- and she also moved the inappropriately installed camera which I also had complained about].

After an almost one year legal battle I got what I wanted: the new landlord moved the WiFi router and removed the inappropriately placed camera. She bore huge lawyer fees, but it cost me zero lawyer fees.

She should have listened to her father who had just gifted her the building, that she should have complied with my reasonable demand and moved the router some meters away which would significantly lower the radiation exposure (inverse square law in physics). But she went against his wish and disappointed him. He considered me as a great tenant and had many complements for me over many years including being a "man of high integrity", and wrote a stellar reference letter for my Swiss citizenship. 

This document contains no defamatory material, and no invasion of privacy. It's 100% truthful and pertains to the public sphere because the subject of fighting against exposure to high frequency EMF is a topic of interest in many people (thousands of people in Switzerland for example, have petitioned against unwanted exposure to HF-EMF). Also, the landlord advertises rental property to the public and I found that the very unit I was living in was advertised with false dimensions to make it look much bigger than it was. If you see anything in this article that requires correction please notify me via the contact page - accuracy is very important to me.

REGARDING: BRUNO MUELLER, CORINA WEHRLE SCHERER, WALTER SCHERER, Immotrend, ImmoWettingen, Immo Aargau AG

WARNING: Bruno Mueller of Immo Aargau AG has advertised residence in the building on Grenzstrasse in Wettingen which is larger than any of the residences there, therefore it's false advertising. It's not illegal but it's a wrong action in my view.

I was a tenant of Dr. Walter Scherer (Doctor of Law not medicine) for many years (since a year after I moved to Switzerland). He liked me a lot as a tenant and person -- he wrote glowing references for me -- called me a man of high integrity -- and considered me as a model tenant. 

Dr. Scherer's reference letter and other remarks can be found at the following link, as well as letters from other tenants and neighbors:

• https://www.rezamusic.com/testimonials/reza-ganjavi-personal-references

And full references:

• https://www.rezamusic.com/testimonials
  
  

Dr. Scherer also looked up to me to keep an eye on things since sometimes he ended up having problematic tenants, especially since he assigned the property management to Bruno Mueller of Immo Aargau AG (www.immo-aargau-ag.ch). Before that, for many years, Dr. Scherer managed the building himself, and relied on my help as his most trusted tenant, giving me privileges nobody else had, and treated me like his son. I also liked him a lot and trusted him. We were at the same frequency, intellectual and understanding level. 

Dr. Scherer liked and trusted me so much that he even offered that I make the adjacent house (which was also his) into a Bed and Breakfast, stay there, run it, and make a music studio in the basement. He even bought a classic bed and breakfast coat hanger which he gifted to me. It was a nice idea but it was not my cup of tea. 

Bruno Mueller was very different than Walter Scherer, in every way imaginable. Dr. Scherer was a soft spoken gentleman. Bruno Mueller was a loud man whose normal talking volume would hurt my ears. You could hear him from any corner of the building when he talked to anyone. Dr. Scherer was highly educated and cultured, spoke several languages fluently. Bruno Mueller had no higher education, and went to a vocational school, and he did not seem like a cultured man. Dr. Scherer was respectful. Bruno Mueller was in my opinion, often disrespectful -- he talked like a bully, which reminded me of a drum -- the bigger the emptiness inside, the louder the sound.

Dr. Scherer was very wealthy -- old money -- many properties in canton Aargau, and canton Ticino (e.g. Villa Palma Capolago) -- some he sold -- some he gave away to his daughter, Corina Wehrle Scherer, including our building and the building next door. In my opinion, Corina was so different than her father, in ways which are typical for some children of wealthy people. 

I stayed in that building for many years because it was in a very good, central location -- 15 minutes walk from center of Baden -- and I tolerated the small size of my place because I was traveling sometimes 100% for work (was always gone and for a long time I was practically living in hotels during extensive international business travel, so the cheap rent was perfect -- and when I was there, I lived a minimalist life which was fine: you learn to utilize space efficiently, and my needs are simple, and there was enough place for my guitar, a nice Persian carpet for doing yoga, for cooking, bed, closet, desk, etc. -- so it was not uncomfortable. What I did miss was to have a guest room because I like having guests, and my Persian heritage/hospitality means the guests should have their own room, and not sleep on the sofa.

The building attracted a wide range of tenants: One group were highly educated professionals, doctors, PhDs etc., who like me traveled a lot for work or had another apartment near their work (like I did at two points in my career, where I kept my little place, and rented another place where my job contract was -- and sometimes very nice places for example in Geneva, while working for the United Nations' World Intellectual Properties Organization (WIPO/OMPI) I had a beautiful apartment in front of the famous Hotel Wilson where world leaders stay, and rich Arab sheiks rented entire floors of the hotel for all their wives and kids, and even brought their favorite Rolls Royce for their summer Swiss holiday -- and their wives walked by Lake Geneva in groups like bundles of eggplants all covered up in their burkas, and expressed themselves to the outer world via their lethally strong perfumes.

Aside from Medical Doctors, Professors, PhDs and MBAs like me, the building also attracted the lower end of the scale in terms of income, class, civility, etc. Some of these people were very nice people. Workers who led a peaceful life, like my good friend from Portugal. But some others were no good. They caused bigtime problems in the house. Many years ago, we had some of these people, and Dr. Scherer and I worked hard to "clean" the house of these elements. Dr. Scherer was very appreciative of my help and expressed in in many ways. He considered me like his son. He talked about me running the second building he also owned next door, build a music studio there, etc. -- we even talked about doing Airbnb there -- but it wasn't my cup of tea.

I believe his daughter did not like the fact that her father and I were close and had a good relationship, which was based on my being there many years as a tenant -- his knowing my character and values -- his knowing my background and my father whom he spoke highly of. Dr. Scherer realized great things about my father immediately because he was very sharp and he knew the topic -- that average people would not realize so quickly, and he respected my father a lot.

So Dr. Scherer and I brought the house to a high level that it had never been -- but it took us a lot of effort -- a lot of pain -- having to deal with problem people such as the youngster who was a drug dealer and once I saw him with drugs and a fake gun that looked real -- and I called the police -- and in their casual relaxed style it took the Swiss police 45 minute to show up which gave the boy plenty of time to go hide the drugs (and go get it again after the police left)!  Dr. Scherer sought my help in the legal process in evicting him, and he was successful -- the boy's father was a rich guy who was up for putting up a fight but Dr. Scherer won the case. And so on.

Also, I had access to the attic when no other tenant had -- Dr. Scherer trusted me with the key. I store my offline things there (luggage, etc.). I also helped Dr. Scherer in management and cleanup of the attic.

Then Bruno Mueller came into the picture. From the time he came, the quality of the tenants went down. It seemed he'd rent units to the first people who'd show up. Dr. Scherer perhaps did more vetting. So we ended up with a host of very problematic tenants, including a couple of guys who were on psychiatric drugs -- and caused a lot of problems. We had a no-smoking rule, which I helped establish in the house, which Dr. Scherer fully supported and sought my help in maintaining it. Some of these problem people Bruno Mueller brought in didn't respect that rule, and smoking is like urinating in a swimming pool -- it travels around, and it stinks.

Bruno Mueller would come, walk into a unit where the guy was smoking, and walk out and say he doesn't smell anything which I believe he was lying, or his nose didn't work well, or he couldn't handle it, couldn't manage it.  He indeed couldn't manage it because his style was ineffective. When Dr. Scherer managed the building, he'd send one stern notice in writing and the problem would finish. Mueller would come around with a loud voice and tell a guy who was smoking weed and cigarettes in the building not to smoke, and Mueller would put signs on the wall. But as soon as he'd leave it was business as usual because people could see through his loudness, and his style was proven ineffective because the problems went on and on. Dr. Scherer's approach was very different, and worked. 

In fact, Mr. Mueller's style backfired: the problem elements got stronger because they began managing Mueller -- they knew next time he comes shouting they'll give him some empty promises and he'll just go away.

Another figure in this drama was the Italian maintenance family who lived next door. Nice people and we had a good contact. Dr. Scherer wasn't happy with their performance and wanted to terminate their contract, and again, asked for my help. He eventually succeeded. Mind you, contract terminations in Switzerland are not as easy as in the USA or some other countries. But it also depends on your ethnic origins -- if you're a non-native-Swiss against a native-Swiss, chances are high the judicial authorities will help the native-Swiss because of high degree of moral corruption which I believe is the default, with exception -- because unconscious bias is primitive and deep rooted, and it's part of the education: Some of my native-Swiss friends have told me they were taught that they're the best in the world (and naturally, everyone else is inferior -- so this Swiss Supremecist attitude as I call it is quite common -- which becomes a problem and abusive when legal authorities exercise bias).

Among the problem tenants that Mueller brought in was a mega bully Italian older guy who looked and acted like a "boss" and was loud, crude, and also didn't respect the building's rules, e.g., no smoking. Dr. Scherer used to tell me Italians are fine individually, but when they get into a group they can be terrible. Dr. Scherer also told me about an Italian guy who would get money and testify whatever they payer wanted in court.

So the building developed a strong pole of Italians -- most of whom were temporary street construction workers, including the old man himself -- and most of these people were breaking the rules by smoking in the house, etc. -- and it included the Italian maintenance family next door -- and to balance this act, Dr. Scherer asked for my help. He was so fond of me that he said he admired me for standing up to the problem people "like a lion". But it was not easy.  Two thugs threatened to kill me by breaking my neck -- just because I reminded them of the no-smoking rule. In both cases, I wrote to them informing them of their criminal conduct and if it ever gets repeated I would press criminal charges against them. They didn't repeat it, and one of them became remorseful and we became friends later.

After Scherer executed the plot around Mueller, with my help, and ousted the problem elements, the building became quieter, and I became friends with a couple of Italian brothers who lived there. I had gained respect of one because he once did something terrible but I handled it kindly and civilly. The other too, shared my concern, and they were both fed up with Mueller and his loud and intrusive ways, bossy attitude, and his new intrusive security camera (which he finally removed when I filed a legal complained and got a lawyer who had won a similar case at the Swiss Federal Supreme Court-- and that lawyer cost me nothing! The brother was acting kind of like a double-agent :-) He was friends with me and complained to me about Mueller and the camera etc., but he was also going along with Mueller, probably because Mueller was the boss and could evict him if he didn't go along.

Another one of the problem tenants Mueller brought to the building was a native-Swiss guy on psychiatric drugs and illegal drugs (also with the last name Scherer). He had all night parties...and he would crazyily knock on people's doors in the middle of night. One night I went up to tell him to keep the party quiet since it's 2 am. He called the police on me telling the police that I had guns :-) -- imagine!! The police came, in full tactical gear, and I go out to tell them about the guy. And they said he said you have a gun - can we search your room - I said, sure, go for it. Of course they didn't find anything, and they quickly believed me when they saw my life and personality, and took issue with the guy.

The next day the guy came and threatened to kill me if I tell him about the smoking rule again. To protect myself, I recorded that threat, and I filed a criminal complaint. The cantonal police told me that there were about 100 complaints about the guy by various people over the years but nobody had pressed charged -- I'd be the first. I absolutely wanted to press charges since he clearly had not learned.

The prosecutor convicted him of criminal conduct, and fined him. A long-time later I found out that he had killed himself, which I was not surprised about because he was on so much drugs, and he was so mentally disturbed.

Reminder again: we also had a Professor, a Medical Doctor, and at least one PhD and other professionals in the building too. Dr. Scherer and I wondered: why is Mueller bringing these problem people? I had a theory about it: Mueller is not highly educated. If he brought the kind of people Dr. Scherer brought (like, a professional with MBA, a PhD, a professor, a medical doctor), Mueller couldn't utilize the management style he knows to "control" these people, be on top of them, manage them, because PhDs, MBAs, and MDs walk all over Mueller intellectually. In my opinion, Mueller's brought people at his education level or lower, and often ones who were foreign, who didn't know their rights, didn't know the language, etc., so he can "manage" them in the way he knows how: loud voice, etc. which is totally unnecessary if you have good tenants, and even with the druggies, etc., Mueller's approach was a failure as judged by the result, e.g. Dr. Scherer having to pull off a plot to get rid of them, around Mueller's back). In all the years that Dr. Scherer managed the building he never shouted once!

We also had another guy who was on psychiatric drugs and was also smoking marijuana, cigarettes, and drinking, etc. in the house -- he also started as a renter after Bruno Mueller became the property manager. I do believe Mr. Mueller did not do a good job of vetting prospective tenants. Or perhaps he brought in people he felt he could "control" in his style of management which was very different than Dr. Scherer's. He caused a lot of problems too -- and he was part of the Italian group but he wasn't Italian -- but they had the same habits like smoking etc. He eventually got kicked out after causing a lot of problems, as part Dr. Scherer's "mass clean up" plot which he orchestrated with my help, behind Bruno Mueller's back.

Once I went to town and came back and my key would not fit in the door. I called Dr. Scherer -- and the police who said the complaint has to come from the owner of the building. I don't think Dr. Scherer pressed charges. It was clear to me who had done it. The locksmith who came to change the lock said it was a mafia-style destruction of property.

DR. SCHERER'S PLOT TO EVICT THE PROBLEM TENANTS

During the Italian drama, Dr. Scherer invited me to his house, and said that I should take a letter that I received from Mueller, without opening it. So I took the letter there. Dr. Scherer said this is a fake eviction notice. Mind you, Mueller was on the side of the Italians. Dr. Scherer wanted the problem tenants out. He told me if he says to Bruno Mueller that he only wants the problem Italian out, Mueller would get upset. Think about the difference in the levels of intellectual understandings. Also, he was afraid of these tenants. He said they could burn the house down. 

So Scherer devised this plot -- that they will get a eviction notice, and I would get a (fake) eviction notice, and I would appeal to Mueller via a letter which Dr. Scherer himself wrote for me, as my letter, and Mueler would take that letter to Scherer, and Sherer would cancel the fake eviction notice. And the rest of them would not appeal, and would just get evicted. Dr. Scherer also asked me to pretend that I was sad and upset, and if anyone asks me, I should say I am upset. I'm not very good at playing theater, but to help him out, to get rid of these problem elements, I agreed.

So Mueller had no idea about this plot that Scherer was pulling off with my help, going around Mueller's back. That says a lot!

WIFI ROUTER

I realized a new WiFi router was installed next to my unit. It took a few weeks to track it down after I realized I could not sleep well -- I'd wake up and look older and un-rested -- and I knew something was wrong.

I asked Bruno Mueller and Corina Wehrle to move the router. They sternly opposed it. A long drama ensued. We proposed a new location for the router which was far enough but close enough to work, and other simple requests like using a timer to turn it off at night. Not only they opposed it, Mueller threatened that if I don't accept the router he'll evict me. I called the renter protection agency who said they can't do that. So long story short, after trying everything, I resorted to litigation and took them to court.

Before filing the lawsuit, I pleaded with Dr. Scherer to get his daughter who had just been given that house as a gift (worth millions) to move the frikin router a few meters away. Peter Schlegel and Marcel Hoffmann, two great engineers who know the topic of EMF pollution, wrote letters to Dr. Scherer, and these letters convinced him that the router should be moved. So he told me that he will talk with his daughter. One night I got an SMS from Dr. Sherer who said he had the "blackest" day of his life today when his own daughter stood up to him. So the Wehrle / Mueller team went against Dr. Scherer's wish. The fight was on.

I FOUGHT WITHOUT A LAWYER AND GOT WHAT I WANTED

I filed the case pro-se, without a lawyer, with my not so perfect German -- and an interpreter for the arbitration and trial -- and Mrs. Wehrle got a lawyer, an Italian super short woman who seemed to be thrilled to have a rich client like Mrs. Wehrle. Actually my very first filing was via a lawyer which I quickly fired because he had no clue - he even got the facts wrong - obviously he had not spent time on the case, so I decided to do it myself. In the US I have filed pro-se in Federal Court which is complicated and many lawyers try to avoid, and I got what I wanted. But in Switzerland, not knowing the legal system, and the legal language barrier, and not to mention the racism, it was an uphill battle but I took it on.

In a fair court and fair process this would have been a slam dunk case, but they tried to twist it and twist it, and stated falsehoods as facts, and the witness process was a total joke, and the judge had already made up his mind in favor of the native Swiss defendant BEFORE the trial (which I'm told is normal in Switzerland -- which is mind-boggling !! Why the hell then have a trial if the judge makes up his mind before the trial??), I had experience with this when a prosecutor made up her mind that a native Swiss guy who almost killed me in a hate crime was not guilty, despite the evidence -- I didn't know she would even lie about the evidence and misrepresent everything to get the native-Swiss guy off the hook, despite hard evidentiary facts against him. The saying I've heard among people of foreign origin is that if you're a "foreigner" up against a native Swiss in a court, you have no chance -- which fits in the "systemic racism" that our country's own anti-racism organizations are so worried about. Of course if the "foreigner" knows his or her rights and has the courage to stand up for justice, it's a different story). 

In this case, I also caught the judge fabricating a falsehood at the end, on a legal document, in favor of the native-Swiss defendant and compelled him to fix it. Unbelievable, dark-ages small mindedness you would never think you'd face in a "First World" country in 21st Century. 

I got a ton of reference letters including from many of the present and past tenants of the building, and Dr. Scherer's statements, in support of my case that Mueller/Wehrle's notice had no merit because I also had a statement from Mueller saying if you don't accept the router I will retaliate, which civil law specifically prohibits.

I have an incredibly strong and positive and glowing set of reference letters from many of the present and past tenants of the house, and even neighbors who testified what a good neighbor I was - contrary to the false picture Bruno Mueller tried to paint.  Those reference letters are included in this set:  

• https://www.rezamusic.com/testimonials/reza-ganjavi-personal-references

Mrs. Wehrle's lawyer must have been jubilant at such a lucrative, rich client. I would write long filings, they would answer (the lawyer probably charged her per page read and per page written), and I'd answer with longer filings. I filed enormous documents in response to their weak lines. I don't want to imagine how much this case cost Wehrle but I assume it cost her a lot. I also assume Mueller continued to charge her per their contract, even when he showed up for hearings. 

The lawyer was apparently taking her sweet time -- e.g. after a hearing for a long time later I saw the lawyer standing outside talking TO Wehrle and Mueller -- I had the impression she's working off the clock and I'd be very surprised if she didn't charge Wehrle for every second of her time. 

Also it seemed to me that the lawyer wasn't caring for the truth too much - and was just saying anything, regardless of if it was true or not. Shocking for me to see, as I have utmost respect for truth.

I filed an administrative complaint against the lawyer with the Canton Aargau lawyers commission. 

ARBITRATION

The first arbitration meeting was a disaster. The woman who was supposed to be on the side of the tenant did the opposite because, I believe the tenant was not a native-Swiss vs. a native-Swiss landlord -- I'd heard of many horror stories about such prejudice in the past. But it didn't matter -- I took them to court. When you have a name like Ganjavi vs. a name like Müller, the decision of the small-minded xenophobe, supremacist, racists is clear. Mueller said utter falsehoods and at that time I didn't know a particular Supreme Court decision which I could have used to bring charges against him.)

But at the end of that arbitration I chose to go to trial. The arbitrator tried to get me to agree but it was unacceptable as I refuse to get bullied, and what I was asking was very reasonable and fair. I will file an admin complaint against one of the arbitrators who was supposed to be on the renter's side but she was so incredibly biased and apparently racist. The chief arbitrator was a Swiss woman of Egyptian origin (a migrant I believe).  

As a side-note: a good friend who has had dealings with law and experienced the corruption in Swiss legal system says sometimes some migrants who become Swiss are worse than some native Swiss in terms of being against "foreigners" and become stiff and strict perhaps to identify themselves, due to the tribal mentality, and pick up the bad habit of the "tribe".

COURT

The process took a very long time and it must have been very costly for Wehrle. I added a new case on top of it: about a camera Mueller had installed where he was tracking movements and was acting on them in a way that some people were not happy. I got the best lawyer who had won a similar case about the cameras in the Swiss Supreme Court. My tenancy insurance paid for that lawyer.

Meanwhile, we had the trial for the router case. That was a disaster. I tell the judge (Daniel Peyer Gerichtspräsident Baden) that truth matters (because the other side so much falsehood). The judge responded to me saying "we're not in America"! That's a tragic comedy. It implies that the judge is saying in Switzerland truth doesn't matter Here is my administrative complaint against the judge: 

• English: https://www.rezamusic.com/writings/law-ethics/Daniel-Peyer-Judge-Baden-Court-Aargau

• German: https://www.rezamusic.com/writings/law-ethics/Daniel-Peyer-Richter-Baden-Gericht-Aargau

DISHONEST ADVERTISING 

Bruno Mueller had said several falsehoods and even had misrepresented the size of the units they rent. I have evidence of that: an advertisement by him which had a size of the unit stated much bigger than the actual. He called it "living space" and perhaps his justification is that he also added the hall way, and any area that is shared by other units but it is very odd to call shared areas as "living space" according to a senior Swiss real state agent I spoke to, and according to common sense. If you want to represent things correctly you need to say what the actual dimensions of the private space the person is renting is - you can also say the hallway is this long but it's very uncool and misleading in my view and the view of people I asked, to give the impression that the small unit is much bigger than it is. 

COURT  

Prior to the trial, for a good while, Mueller was schmoozing the potential witnesses (some of the Italian group mentioned above whose associates were evicted by Dr. Scherer with my help without Mueller even being aware of that fact because Dr. Scherer went around him, with my help). I didn't care because facts spoke for themselves. I had plenty of documented facts including Mueller's own statement about the Wifi Router which made my case against them rock solid.

Suddenly a witness is called in: Dr. Scherer! Not exactly a fair, unbiased witness given the plaintiff is his daughter! But the whole trial was a joke from the onset when the judge said "this is not America" when I said "truth matters"! So this was just another episode of a ridiculous joke where the judge exhibited extreme bias time and again because I am a "foreigner" even to the extent of trying to misrepresent the settlement agreement by taking my signature and pasting it in the wrong place!! This tragedy in "justice" is documented here in the above links (in English and German). 

Of course I pushed back hard by calling out his manipulative action and he corrected the document!! A party (in this case Plaintiff) who is a foreigner shouldn't have to compel a judge to correctly represent the settlement agreement which the judge didn't like because I (in his eye, the "foreigner") got what I wanted against the landlord and he didn't like that. The landlord agreed to move the WiFi router after a year of fighting - which is what I wanted on day 1 anyway. And then I immediately moved out (I didn't have to) because I didn't want to deal with this landlord.

I maintained my respect for Dr. Scherer. He said things that were not accurate (about the plot to go around Mueller which by this time Mueller had found out about) but given my respect for him, I was very gentle with him -- it was clear that daddy was there to help the daughter again. So be it. If I had decided to fight that aspect I could have: the fake notice that Dr. Scherer orchestrated to evict the problem tenants was a legal document which they revoked after I "appealed" as orchestrated by Dr. Scherer himself without Mueller knowing -- and the "appeal" letter purportedly from me, was actually written by Dr. Scherere himself -- so I send Mueller the letter Dr. Scherer wrote under my name, which would then be given to Dr. Scherer by Mueller as from me (LOL). What a plot !! :-)  

And then Dr. Scherer would say, oh, that's a nice letter from Mr. Ganjavi (which was in reality was written by Dr. Scherer himself!). The legal problem for Ms. Wehrle and Mr. Mueller was that since that attempt, however fake and orchestrated, had failed (and was designed to fail by Dr. Scherer since he really liked me as a tenant and wanted me to stay there) -- that legally qualified as a condition that prevented any further attempts for some 3 years. 

This was just one of many angles Wehrle's defense case was extremely weak. My case relied on Mueller's own retaliatory statement, on top of much other evidence to debunk their misrepresentations and falsehood he said which either arose out of ignorance or intentional stating of falsehoods as facts. My case relied on solid facts like an enormous pile of reference letters from tenants of present and past, and letters and emails from Dr. Scherer himself talking about what a great tenant I have been - which totally debunked Wehrle/Mueller's post-fact excuses while in reality the entire saga was about my opposition to the location of the WiFi router (which Dr. Scherer totally agreed with me and even asked his daughter, Ms. Wehrle to move the router).

They said so many falsehoods that it was mind boggling. Their lawyer was super hyper - constantly interrupting me - and said so many falsehoods that my head was spinning. But they didn't win despite all the falsehoods they said and an obviously biased judge. 

The judge had a huge pile of solid, strong, positive reference letters about me from so many neighbors and tenants of the present and past, including from Dr. Scherer himself -- that he couldn't deny the fact that I had been a model tenant who was very much liked and appreciated by Dr. Scherer for many years. 

Arbitration: The Complaint I Filed Regarding Allegedly Unlawful Camera

We had an arbitration meeting about the camera about which I had filed a complaint against Wehrle. I went with a lawyer - a hotshot lawyer that had won a similar camera case at the Swiss Federal Supreme Court - and she cost me nothing!  This arbitration meeting was another disaster. A panel member blasted the only non-native-Swiss for talking beyond a few sentences while the others could go blah blah endlessly. There, I blasted Mueller, made sure everybody knows how he has been behaving, and I said I hoped that he had learned a lesson. I suppose Mrs. Wehrle was paying Mr. Mueller for being in that meeting. They had an hourly contract. And, she was paying the lawyer. 

In that meeting we settled both cases. I decided that I don't want to deal with this landlord by being her tenant -- and with that judge, Daniel Peyer, I have no hope for a fair judgment, and I don't really feel like appealing this case because I have no faith in this justice system when it comes to a man of foreign origin verses a native-Swiss (this is something several people had reported). But I played my cards rights, and finally got what I wanted. A few days later, the router was moved, and the camera was gone! Success! And shortly after, I moved out totally by my own decision because I decided that Wehrle and Mueller are not the kind of people I'd want to have anything to do with, including being their tenant. I got a much nicer place.

This drama took about a year. Most of that time during this legal process I stayed with friends because my place was not live-able due to the router being so close to it. Mueller even moved the router closer than before - right behind my wall. And his degree of understanding the subject was so non-existent that he'd say things like: we're changing the doors, and (RF) radiation doesn't come through the door !! Hello!! The new door was also wood, and radiation comes around it through normal walls anyway, even if the door was metal !! 

Bruno Müller was also nagging that when I reported a problem I would send the email after 5 pm!! Hello!! You can easily put a filter on your email inbox to route things appropriately or ignore things till next day, etc. -- you can't control what time people email you, especially if an event happens after 5 pm when a tenant emails you at 6 pm for example!! For years and years Dr. Scherer who also used email did not have an issue with this, nor do I know anyone else in my huge network of contacts who tries to control what time an email is sent to them, like Mueller tried to!

The legal fights against the Wehrle-Mueller team to get the router to move and remove the allegedly unlawfully installed camera cost me zero in lawyer fees. I guess it probably costed Wehrle at least 15,000 or 20,000 Swiss Francs in lawyer fees -- I paid nothing for a lawyer as I did all the work myself except at the end when I brought a specialist and the renters associations paid for her. Also probably Mueller costed Wehrle a bundle since he charges her on an hourly basis. 

I was told cost per page for a typical lawyer is 1 hour which is around 250 francs if not 300 or 350. Her lawyer had to go through my filings which were sometimes 50 pages and the lawyer also wrote sizeable replies that were mainly blah blah - the more she wrote, the bigger the bill for Wehrle. And as far as I know, legal insurance doesn't cover a defense case of a landlord. So it was a big out of pocket for Wehrle. But her dad is so rich that it's peanuts for them. 

And at the end I got what I wanted!  Wehrle should have listened to her dad back then and moved the router, and saved herself a ton of money and lots of stress and time, and did not upset the old man by standing up to him and his reasonable and small wish after he had gifted her millions of francs worth of real-estate. Stubbornness can get costly.

JUDGE DANIEL PEYER'S SCREWUP

So we settled both the router and camera cases and informed Judge Daniel Peyer of that. It's customary that the judge writes a brief saying the case is dismissed by the agreement of the parties. The judge apparently didn't like the outcome: the native-Swiss had to move the router and remove the camera after a year of fighting and paying a ton of money to the lawyer, vs. a foreign-born guy who came to trial without a lawyer :-).  Judge Peyer used creative copy and pasting to depict a different meaning in the closure document which would put me at a disadvantage!!! It's unbelievable!!! I asked him to fix it but he gave me a bullshit excuse. Then I had my lawyer write him a demand letter, and that forced him to clean up the mess he created and corrected his brief. It reminded me of a friend who's a lawyer in Baden who said the court there is so corrupt. Is creative copy/paste a form of corruption? I would say it's a moral issue.

Was this another case of racist, biased sentiments? Probably. By trying to put me down by his distorted copy-paste scheme, I guess he may have gotten a kick out of a non-native-Swiss who actually did extremely well in this legal maneuver which wasn't supposed to turn out this way. The native-Swiss plaintiff spending a ton of money, and at the end of the day, having to remove the router and camera Lol... and me moving out shortly after anyway, by my own decision.

Here is my administrative complaint against the judge: 

• English: https://www.rezamusic.com/writings/law-ethics/Daniel-Peyer-Judge-Baden-Court-Aargau

• German: https://www.rezamusic.com/writings/law-ethics/Daniel-Peyer-Richter-Baden-Gericht-Aargau

I became a EMF activist after this time and helped many others in that area, and set up a site for that purpose (see health/emf section of www.rezamusic.com)

Review:

Be very careful in dealing with Immo Aargau and Bruno Mueller. They have advertised a place that was bigger than the actual size. Also I do not like Bruno Mueller for many reasons including very loud voice volume, ineffective management of problem elements in the building; and he was very disrespectful on many occasions. Even the building's owner had to devise a plot to go around him, with help from me as a tenant, to get rid of the problem tenants Bruno Mueller had brought in and kept, who had created a lot of problems in the building (e.g. repeatedly violating the owner's No Smoking rule) and other issues. A couple of problem tenant Mueller brought in appeared mentally unstable. One ended up getting a criminal conviction after threatening to kill me because I told him about the house's no-smoking rule which the landlord, Dr. Scherer cared a lot about - and so did I. He ended up killing himself some years later. The other got kicked out by a plot orchestrated by the owner, with my help, behind Mueller's back. Another problem tenant destroyed my lock, because I was acting in accordance with the owner's wish and acting in concert with the owner without Bruno Mueller knowing. The locksmith said this was a mafia-type action.

Bruno Mueller and the new owner, Cornia Wehrle resisted my request to move the new WiFi router they installed right next to my unit. His new boss, Corina Wehrle who received the buildings as gift from her dad, Dr. Walter Scherer even went against Dr. Scherer's own wish to move the router. The drama ended up in me taking Werhle to court and after almost a year of fight, Wehrle and Mueller ended up moving the router and the inappropriately placed security camera. She could have saved a lot of money in lawyer fees, if herself and Mueller had not been so stubborn. 

I chose to move out of there as soon as the router was moved and the camera was removed -- after getting what I wanted -- because in the process I saw clearly that I do not want to have any relationship with these people (being a tenant is a form of relationship). 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

DEUTSCH 

DEUTSCHE VERSION (AUTOMATISCH ÜBERSETZT VON DEEPL UND KANN FEHLER ENTHALTEN. SIEHE DIE ENGLISCHE VERSION FÜR DEN AUTHENTISCHEN ORIGINALTEXT)

GERMAN VERSION (AUTO-TRANSLATED BY DEEPL AND MAY CONTAIN ERRORS. SEE THE ENGLISH VERSION FOR THE AUTHENTIC ORIGINAL TEXT)