Oesch’s retaliatory action against judge and prosecutors, etc.
Warning: This is a crazy but true story!!
After losing his bid to stop the forfeiture of his Ponzi scheme money by the U.S. authorities, and after threatening the judge with punitive action, and convicting the judge (in the court of Oesch’s imaginations), Oesch reportedly sent bills “invoice billing statements” to the judge (misspelling her name) and prosecutors etc., totaling $29.44 Trillion. When the civil servants obviously didn’t pay, Oesch got his/Leaming’s notary to issue “certificates of default” which he filed with the Court of Federal Claims (COFC) to get the judge to force the hard-working, people-serving government employees to pay up. But the judge obviously dismissed the case.
Oesch called the invoice: “Notice of Final Determination and Judgment.” The bizarre document sought a sum that would more than double the U.S. Gross Domestic Product: $29.4 Trillion… PLUS interest and compounded penalties.”!!!
GDP for the United States in 2009 was about $14.25 trillion, meaning that Leaming and Oesch sought to collect from five public servants a sum that was more than twice the production output of the entire U.S. economy last year.
Leaming and Oesch said they defined $1 as “one ounce of .999 fine silver, or a pre-1964 United States Silver Dollar, whichever value is greater.” The men said they’d accept U.S. “fiat currency” for payment if it was tied to the “spot price for silver as established on the date of tender at London, England.”180
However, there are a number of articles that refer to ASD figures, Oesch and Leaming, having unsuccessfully sued the United States for $29 Trillion, e.g.,     , and:
o Utah resident and ASD figure Christian Oesch — later to join with Washington state resident and ASD figure Kenneth Wayne Leaming in a failed 2010 bid to sue the United States for more than twice the U.S. Gross Domestic Product in 2009.
o ASD is known to have so-called “sovereign citizens” in its ranks. Two ASD figures — Kenneth Wayne Leaming and Christian Oesch — sought unsuccessfully to sue the government for its actions in the ASD case, apparently seeking the staggering sum of more than $29 trillion, more than twice the U.S. Gross Domestic Product in 2009.
o ASD figures Kenneth Leaming and Christian Oesch have filed an ASD-related lawsuit apparently seek the spectacular sum of $29 TRILLION from a federal judge, three federal prosecutors and a Secret Service agent.
I didn’t want to pay to get the COFC original pleading scanned (especially having seen Oesch’s past gobbledygook writings), so I’ve only seen the judgment that indicates the lawsuit was to get those claims enforced. But a lawsuit to demand enforcement of a $29 Trillion invoice is effectively the same as a lawsuit for $29 Trillion, thus a bit of loose terminology.
Notable is the judge at the COFC denied Oesch’s request to sanction the government lawyers, because of the way Oesch talked to them, calling them “unethical” (a favorite Oesch attack line). But the judge sounded very fair, competent, intelligent.190
Oesch publicly lied about the amount forfeited by the U.S. Government
Oesch stated in his court filing in the ASD Ponzi scheme forfeiture case that $54,055 was forfeited from his company by U.S. Government. If we assume that number was true, and his public statement was about this case (no other such case can be found – and see letter), it means he publicly lied this year saying U.S. Government “stole” $4.2 millions of his company’s money! An exaggeration to the tune of $4,147,000! It’s also possible that he may have lied in his claim as proactive measure against possible more adverse events if he had more money in the scheme. He lied in one of those instances.
He failed to substantiate the fiction when I asked him in a recent letter.
Oesch publicly lied that the forfeiture action was a fraud, and theft by U.S. Government
Oesch has falsely accused a number of parties of fraud over the years, including US Government, FNMA, and more recently in some stone-cold lies he said in Switzerland (see Hardell-Ganjavi project section). Under Swiss law, false accusation of criminal conduct (e.g. fraud) is a criminal offence if it is prosecuted and the accused is found to not be guilty. Even if the US government knew that Oesch has made such accusations against it, they probably wouldn’t bother pressing charges – they already tolerated the nasty things he said to the judge and the prosecutors and moved on. Again, to be clear, my research on this topic is not on legality, but moral issues like intentionally stating falsehoods as fact. I am not accusing Oesch of unlawful conduct.
Oesch publicly accused the U.S. Government of having defrauded his company and stolen its money. By his company, he must mean HERS – since I can’t find any other cases that involve any of his many “companies” in a litigation against US Government that fit that description (and match other descriptions he provided, e.g. forfeiture), and he named HERS in his motion in the ASD Ponzi scheme forfeiture case.
· I looked extensively but could not find any cases where US Government was convicted of fraud and theft committed against Oesch.
· Even without such conviction, in my opinion, the arguments presented by Oesch to support a fraud and theft claim against USA are baseless. When you go in the kitchen you take the heat. He got involved in a Ponzi scheme; it got busted.
Oesch publicly lied about the reason behind the forfeiture case
Oesch publicly said the purported $4.2 million was because of the Merrill Lynch banking crisis, while in reality, as illustrated here, it was probably because of the ASD Ponzi scheme case. There’s no mention of the Merrill Lynch crisis in the Ponzi scheme case, and I can’t find any other connections, and Oesch dodged the issue when I gave him the opportunity to clarify it in this letter. Therefore, it seems that Oesch lied.
Oesch’s Failed Retaliatory Legal Action For $29 TRILLION Against U.S. Government
After losing the ASD Ponzi scheme forfeiture case, Oesch lived up to his vile threats of retaliation to the judge et al.. Together with Lemming, Oesch billed them / filed a retaliatory lawsuit against the U.S. Government etc. remanding a whopping sum of $29.44 Trillion. To be exact:
Oesch claimed his forfeited assets were $54,055, but we don’t know if that is true. He might have proactively downplayed his engagement to prevent potential adverse next steps, since nobody at that stage knew what would be next.
“And not surprising to most of us, the "ASD Group" who filed all of those 'Motions to Intervene' in the ASD forfeiture case are now associated with a nonsensical claim filed in the Court of Claims, a complaint by Oesch and Leaming, asking for a penalty of $29.44 TRILLION dollars. I know, I didn't believe it either, but it's true.”
Mind you, the U.S. GDP is far below $29 Trillion 196!! Oesch demanded a sum that’s double USA’s entire economy, and the size of the big Bank Bailout  which was also $29 trillion. I didn’t find any Merrill Lynch crisis connection despite diligent search.
As expected, the judge dismissed the case, and wrote
that the complaint “deteriorated into rambling” which
is not surprising given lack of any solid arguments,
Oesch’s lack of academic credentials, and his apparent
affinity for Sovereign Citizen ideology, where rambling
seems to be part of the culture.
Here’s an excerpt from the U.S. COFC court ruling:
The original pleading is in public domain but is in paper form, and I didn’t want to pay to have it scanned (and that would have made it available to the public, online). Reading the judge’s interpretation that it disintegrated into rambling, was all I needed to know – and that makes sense given the “Sovereign Citizens” style of flooding the courts with nonsensical arguments and nonsensical language (e.g., as the judge pointed out “In Admiralty”) and other such strange jargons233. Oesch’s filing is together with co-Plaintiff, Leaming, who just served a long prison sentence over multiple criminal action – see section on Ken Leaming.
Tina Hall who lost her notary license, was engaged in notarizing Leaming’s bogus liens and claims. She was coerced by him to notarize things171. Leaming was a co-plaintiff in this case and close associate of Oesch. It’s not known whether she was coerced by Oesch and Leaming to notarize the “certificates of default” which was a crazy idea: trying to get $29 Trillion from authorities who authorized the legal forfeiting of Oesch’s money which was in the Ponzi scheme.
Another article180 links the $29 trillion retaliatory action to ASD Ponzi scheme civil-forfeiture:
“The lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, appears to be tied to an earlier failed bid by Leaming and Oesch to demand a payment for the astronomical sum of $29 TRILLION from a federal judge, three federal prosecutors and a U.S. Secret Service agent for their actions in the ASD civil-forfeiture cases filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in 2008”.
Unfortunately for Oesch, he got ZERO dollars from his inappropriate, nonsensical, attempted retaliation against a respectable judge and other officials.
Oesch Was Sued By U.S. Government Entity, FNMA
As stated herein, Oesch bragged publicly about having sued the U.S. Government (though the case was tossed out) and (falsely) accused U.S. of having committed fraud and theft of his company’s money. To assess the validity of his claim (and also as part of assessing his background to assess another public fake claim he made), I looked into public records for cases that might fit his description. The ASD case didn’t confirm Oesch’s claim.
I then came across another case in public domain
involving a U.S. Government sponsored entity,
Federal National Mortgage Association / FNMA /
Fannie Mae which sued Oesch and his wife  .
The case had an intricate history that I didn’t waste too much time on. It was essentially about a property that FNMA wanted to force an eviction on. What stood out based on documents I looked at in Federal Court filings:
· Oesch again accused his counterparty, Plaintiff FNMA of “counterfeit Complaint is based on fraud, deceit, coercion…”
· Oesch again used some Sovereign Citizen lingo.
· The case took a long time. Oesch must have spent a lot of time on it, especially since he was pro-se, which again helps debunk his public lies.
In his news report, Journalist Patrick Pretty (PatrickPretty.com Covering Ponzi schemes And Internet Crime) wrote:
‘“Oesch, who once claimed that U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer and other public officials involved in the ASD case were guilty of racketeering and antitrust violations, now has essentially accused Fannie Mae of the same thing.
Oesch went on to argue that “US authorities from the highest level downwards, financial institutions, intermediaries, Intelligence Power operatives and others are gearing up for what they doubtless hope will be intensified racketeering and trading activity with (corrupt) foreign counterparties.
“This behavior is being fine-tuned ‘as we speak’ . . .” Oesch ventured.
He went on to advance a conspiracy theory that involved the “US Treasury, the White House, the US State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency and its subsidiaries such as the lethal Office of Naval Intelligence . . .”’200
Calling himself a “transmitting utility” clearly demonstrates the Sovereign Citizen ideology.
“Meanwhile, Christian Oesch, a Leaming colleague in a failed lawsuit against the government for alleged misdeeds in the ASD case, strangely has taken to calling himself a “transmitting utility” in response to a nonASD lawsuit in which he is named a defendant.
Records in Washington state show that at least two companies that use the phrase “transmitting utility” in their names have a business tie to Leaming through an entity known as American-International Business Law Inc. Other records show that the phrase itself has been linked to the so-called sovereign-citizen movement. “Sovereign citizens” have an irrational belief that laws do not apply to them.”44
Oesch Was Involved in a number of other lawsuits in the USA
During this research, a cursory look at public records showed Christian Oesch was involved in a number of other lawsuits in the USA. I don’t have the time to dig into them. One example is, he was sued by MBNA America Bank   and lost his appeal of the arbitration award (assuming it was the same Christian Oesch since he was in Utah, at the same time, and there is no record for any other Christian Oesch’s in Utah).
CHAPTER 8: Links between Tax Scheme, Ponzi scheme; Oesch’s engagements that debunk his public lies; conspiracy theories; pseudonyms
Some of Oesch’s tax scheme companies were related to the ASD Ponzi scheme.
Oesch promoted various conspiracy theories, against the governments, banking system, taxation, etc.
Oesch’s online comments using pseudonyms shed more light on his anti-government sentiments.
As a brief recap, so far, we saw that Oesch was engaged in tax/debt schemes for a long time via his companies, GDS, HERS, HIS etc. – which he says nothing about in his resume – and which debunks his lie about dedicating his career in last 20 years to EMF and “health” research. Perhaps he was referring to health of his Offshore bank account!
Link Between ASD Ponzi scheme & Tax Schemes
At some point Oesch got engaged with Ad Surf Daily Ponzi scheme. There is some evidence that indicate the tax/debt scheme and ASD may have been related. An article by an investigative journalist illustrates the link between Oesch’s GDS tax/debt scheme and ASD Ponzi scheme:
A pro se litigant [Christian Oesch] whose filing was docketed yesterday in the AdSurfDaily case used a phone number associated with a defunct credit-repair website [GDS112] that once advertised “Mortgage Elimination,” “Debt Elimination,” “Credit Restoration,” “Asset Restructuring,” “Off Shore Investments” and “Deciphering of Taxes.”210. [I call this “tax scheme” in this document since it sprung out of tax protestation ideas and that is probably its ultimate goal.]
“Pro Se Filer [Christian Oesch] In ASD Case Used
Phone Number Associated With Debt-Elimination
Firm; Name Linked To Group Prosecutors Called
‘Notorious’ For Defying Tax Laws.”
The “notorious tax defying” group, is We The People (discussed above) whose chapter in Utah was run by Oesch.
Individuals associated with a culture of pro se pleadings and rants against the government [e.g. Sovereign Citizens/Tax Protestors] began to inject themselves into the legal battle ASD is confronting.
A commentator on the article210 illustrated something interesting:
“It looks as if there is another “sub-group” of promoters within ASD – the Tax Defiers. I had never heard of this group of people until the ASD case became public. They sound like a group of loonies who are trying to make tax evasion legal, using the great American Freedom of Speech to do so. I hope Judge Collyer gets rid of all their motions fast and no more time and money is wasted on processing these ridiculous claims.”
Conspiracy Theories About Banks / Financial System / US & Swiss Governments / Medicine
The article210 quotes Oesch’s GDS website:
“Learn about what the IRS, the Bankers, your CPA, Tax Attorney or Politicians do not want you to know . . .”.
“Oesch filed the ASD motion as president of a Washington company known as Human Economic Resource Solutions” which he owned together with Washington based Leaming315.
“Some people within the ASD organization … were associated with a group or groups who viewed banking in general and the Federal Reserve in particular as a conspiracy”.
An audio file obtained from GDS called “Banking Fraud”, states that bankers control all major media…
A comment on the post4 about the seminar Oesch as GDS organized states: “the modern day banking system has been designed to put the people in debt, keep the people in debt” blah blah (leading up to the idea I suppose, that if you pay the guy he will teach you magically how to get rid of your debt).
These beliefs sound much like Oesch’s. He has voiced similar beliefs in my limited interactions with him, e.g., an email he sent to my mailing list, many of whom he didn’t know so it couldn’t have been private:
“the Swiss Government is by default the mandate for the Vatican, and those boys hold the entire world on its balls for the secret societies (Rothschild & Co.) that run the global show and systems. They run the banking system, and when you run and control the central banking system, you control and run those countries and their governments. They also run the USA, in case you should not know?”
Sorry I don’t buy this nonsense. Funny how “Rothschilds and Rockefellers” is the ultimate dead-end of most shallow, simplistic conspiracy theories.
The company Oesch ran as CEO, promoted a false, irrational conspiracy theory that the pharmaceutical industry determines whether a doctor can have a medical license or not!!421 See section on BX Protocol.
Recently Oesch has been promoting disinformation / conspiracy theories around Covid-19 .
Oesch’s Aliases, “Oesch English”, Anti-America Comments
I read a page where Oesch allegedly post a comment as “Jonny” and someone calls him out as Christian Oesch. By the time I finished reading his comment, I also formed the opinion that at least Jonny (and perhaps another one too) is probably Christian Oesch – same “Oesch English” and some cliché phrases he uses. E.g., in a court filing in the FNMA case Oesch told a debtor: “Please govern yourself timely and accordingly.”222 – “govern yourself” is not a common phrase but it is, in “Oesch English” (I’ve seen it used in multiple places by him). He may have used other aliases to comment there as well.
For the sake of this paper, we assume we do not know who “Jonny” is. The article210 is directly about Oesch. “Jonny” blasts the author and the government’s handling of the ASD Ponzi scheme, etc.
Another poster wrote:
“This Jonny guy is actually an alias for Christian Oesch. I would recognize his anti-government propaganda anywhere. That and his slight misuse of the English language because he is from Switzerland.”.
In his response, “Jonny” didn’t deny that; and his writing sounds just like Oesch. He wrote a long rambling that included a bunch of nasty things about the author and the article, in bad English:
“socialist-fascist-communist non-sense of garbage”.
He called the U.S. Government “NAZI”, “bastards”, and
“the chaos is just like when Hitler got momentum in NAZI Germany.”
Mr. Patrick Pretty (author of the article) wrote a sensible reply to “Jonny” who is probably Oesch and addressed all the ramblings beautifully. Here’s an excerpt.
How can Oesch and Leaming expect to “prove” the government damaged them when ASD was permitted to continue to show advertisements and chose not to do so? Meanwhile, how can they purport that acts by the government cost them money if they were not investors? The only thing Oesch and Leaming were entitled to was to have their advertisements shown. Just ask Bowdoin. If Oesch and Leaming want to argue they were advertisers who got ripped off, why didn’t they sue Bowdoin for not delivering their ads?”
Any person who describes a case brought by the U.S. Secret Service and the DOJ under court supervision as “socialist-fascist-communist non-sense of garbage” and the work of Nazis and bastards… The government stole no one blind. The ASD money was seized under judicial supervision. The District Court that has jurisdiction decreed it forfeited after analyzing the pleadings and conducting an evidentiary hearing in public in which ASD’s expert witness and other witnesses testified in public, were cross-examined in public and evidence was tested in public.
On a side note, Leaming tried to attach a lien for $9.2 BILLION against a faith-based hospital in Washington state that admitted 6,995 patients, handled 48,363 patient visits to its Emergency Department and received 26,114 outpatient visits during the 2008 fiscal year. Do you know if Christian Oesch is OK with that? It’s spectacularly poor PR to go around trying to attach $9.2 billion liens against a Franciscan hospital that serves entire communities. Leaming saw fit to put his needs before the needs of entire communities. And a $10 million lien against a City Council? Those acts would seem to be inconsistent with a spirit of community and consistent with selfishness — especially since Leaming publicly acknowledged the “Almighty Creator...”
“Rocky”180 and “Hammer”210 are among the aliases that sound like Oesch. Patrick Pretty even calls these two out as the same person180. Quite a discussion on the comment section of that article180, with people calling out “Rocky” and his woowoo theories, and wonder if his attitude is shaped by having made a lot of money off ASD. We don’t know how much Oesch made off ASD. He claimed around $54,055 but any such number in such a legally sensitive case, and coming from Oesch, I don’t trust.